Printed from www.ImpeachBush.TV

Subscribe to our Newsletter

"The 35 Articles of Impeachment and the Case for Prosecuting George W. Bush", is available for the cost of $12; and a free downloadable PDF is available on the same site.

Why Impeach? | Lies | Uranium/Niger | Torture | Aluminum Tubes | Wiretaps | Subpoenas | Treaties | HJR114 | Talking Points |

Talking Points to use with Members of Congress

Updated 3/20/08 at 6:00 PM

These talking points argue that Bush should be impeached by Congress. We present an opening script followed by rebuttals to Congress members' common objections.

Note: It is assumed here that the listener already agrees that Bush has committed impeachable offenses.

Some Possible Opening Statements

  1. Do you support Congressman Wexler's call for impeachment hearings for Dick Cheney?
  2. We all know that Bush and Cheney have committed impeachable offenses. We understand that impeachment is difficult. But our system of Democracy is threatened and we need you to protect and defend our Constitution. Only you can do that for us.
  3. Bush has resisted every effort at Congressional oversight. He has used executive privilege and the state secrets act to protect himself. Impeachment is the only mechanism we have left that can prevent further abuse of office.

Rebuttals to Common Responses

  1. When they say "We need to work with the Republicans to pass legislation."
  2. When they say "Impeachment would distract us from more important matters."
  3. When they say "The Republicans and the powers behind the President would retaliate politically."
  4. When they say "There is not enough time for impeachment."
  5. When they say "Bush will leave office soon anyway."
  6. When they say "Impeachment would hurt the Democrats in the next election."
  7. When they ask "Why bother with hearings when we need 218 votes in the House to impeach?"
  8. When they ask "Why bother with impeachment when we need a 2/3 majority in the Senate to convict?"
  9. When they say "My constituents are not asking for impeachment."
  10. When they say "There aren't any crimes that rise to the level of impeachable offense."
  11. When they say "But John Conyers needs to make the first move."
  12. When they say "But we are pursuing contempt charges against Miers and Bolton. Isn't that enough?"
  13. When they think but don't say "We need to occupy Iraq and steal their oil to protect our future."
  14. When they say "Bush might do something rash like declare martial law to stay in power."

If you hear any new objections please let us know.

When they say "We need to work with the Republicans to pass legislation."

When they say "Impeachment would distract us from more important matters."

When they say "The Republicans and the powers behind the President would retaliate politically."

When they say "There is not enough time for impeachment."

When they say "Bush will leave office soon anyway."

When they say "Impeachment would hurt the Democrats in the next election."

When they ask "Why bother with hearings when we need 218 votes in the House to impeach?"

When they ask "Why bother with impeachment when we need a 2/3 majority in the Senate to convict?"

When they say "My constituents are not asking for impeachment."

When they say "There aren't any crimes that rise to the level of impeachable offense."

When they say "But John Conyers needs to make the first move."

When they say "But we are pursuing criminal and civil contempt charges against Miers and Bolten. Isn't that enough?"

When they think but don't say "We need to occupy Iraq and steal their oil to protect our future."

When they say "Bush might do something rash like declare martial law to stay in power."

This seem crazy but some members of Congress and staffers have actually expressed concern about this.

 

The liberal alternative to Drudge.          Prosecute Bush and Cheney